I think you’re probably right. The possibility of the funder being their own matcher-of-last-resort probably destroys the scheme. I hadn’t thought about this before, thanks for pointing it out.
One potential way to fix this would be to require the identification of donors, so that you cannot fund anonymously. But this would make the proposal a bit more complicated.
I think you’re probably right. The possibility of the funder being their own matcher-of-last-resort probably destroys the scheme. I hadn’t thought about this before, thanks for pointing it out.
One potential way to fix this would be to require the identification of donors, so that you cannot fund anonymously. But this would make the proposal a bit more complicated.