I suspect the âedge casesâ illustrate a large part of the general problem: there are a lot of grey areas here, where finding the right course requires a context-specific application of good judgement. E.g. what âcountsâ as being (too?) high status, or seeking to start a ânot seriousâ (enough?) relationship etc. etc. is often unclear in non-extreme casesâeven to the individuals directly involved themselves. I think I agree with most of the factors noted by the OP as being pro tanto cautions, but aliasing them into a bright line classifier for what is or isnât contraindicated looks generally unsatisfactory.
This residual ambiguity makes life harder, as if you canât provide a substitute for good judgement, guidance and recommendations (rather than rulings) may not give great prospects for those with poorer or compromised judgement to bootstrap their way to better decisions. The various fudge factors give ample opportunity for motivated reasoning (âI know generally this would be inappropriate, but I license myself to do it in this particular circumstanceâ), and sexual attraction is not an archetypal precipitant for wisdom and restraint. Third parties weighing in on perceived impropriety may be less self-serving, but potentially more error-prone, and definitely a lot more acrimoniousâI doubt many welcome public or public-ish inquiries or criticism upon the intimate details of their personal lives (âOh yeah? Maybe before you have a go at me you should explain {what you did/âwhat one of your close friends did/ârumours about what someone at your org did/âetc.}, which was far worse and your silence then makes you a hypocrite for calling me out now.â/â âI donât recall us signing up to âthe EA communityâ, but we definitely didnât sign up for collective running commentary and ceaseless gossip about our sex lives. Kindly consider us âEA-adjacantâ or whatever, and mind your own businessâ/âetc.)
FWIW I haveâfor quite a while, and in a few different respectsânoted that intermingling personal and professional lives is often fraught, and encouraged caution and circumspection for things which narrow the distance between them still further. EA-land can be a chimera of a journal club, a salutatorian model UN, a church youth group, and a swingers partyâthese aspects are not the most harmonious in concert. There is ample evidenceâeven more ample recentlyâthat âencouraging cautionâ or similar doesnât cut it. I donât think the OP has the right answer, but I do not have great ideas myself: it is much easier to criticise than do better.
I suspect the âedge casesâ illustrate a large part of the general problem: there are a lot of grey areas here, where finding the right course requires a context-specific application of good judgement. E.g. what âcountsâ as being (too?) high status, or seeking to start a ânot seriousâ (enough?) relationship etc. etc. is often unclear in non-extreme casesâeven to the individuals directly involved themselves. I think I agree with most of the factors noted by the OP as being pro tanto cautions, but aliasing them into a bright line classifier for what is or isnât contraindicated looks generally unsatisfactory.
This residual ambiguity makes life harder, as if you canât provide a substitute for good judgement, guidance and recommendations (rather than rulings) may not give great prospects for those with poorer or compromised judgement to bootstrap their way to better decisions. The various fudge factors give ample opportunity for motivated reasoning (âI know generally this would be inappropriate, but I license myself to do it in this particular circumstanceâ), and sexual attraction is not an archetypal precipitant for wisdom and restraint. Third parties weighing in on perceived impropriety may be less self-serving, but potentially more error-prone, and definitely a lot more acrimoniousâI doubt many welcome public or public-ish inquiries or criticism upon the intimate details of their personal lives (âOh yeah? Maybe before you have a go at me you should explain {what you did/âwhat one of your close friends did/ârumours about what someone at your org did/âetc.}, which was far worse and your silence then makes you a hypocrite for calling me out now.â/â âI donât recall us signing up to âthe EA communityâ, but we definitely didnât sign up for collective running commentary and ceaseless gossip about our sex lives. Kindly consider us âEA-adjacantâ or whatever, and mind your own businessâ/âetc.)
FWIW I haveâfor quite a while, and in a few different respectsânoted that intermingling personal and professional lives is often fraught, and encouraged caution and circumspection for things which narrow the distance between them still further. EA-land can be a chimera of a journal club, a salutatorian model UN, a church youth group, and a swingers partyâthese aspects are not the most harmonious in concert. There is ample evidenceâeven more ample recentlyâthat âencouraging cautionâ or similar doesnât cut it. I donât think the OP has the right answer, but I do not have great ideas myself: it is much easier to criticise than do better.