I agree that most of the result ends up depending on the effects on wild animals. Always troublesome that so much of the impact depends on that when we have so many uncertainties.
most moral species is that whose extinction would lead to the greatest reduction in the value of the future
We probably donât have the same definitionâif wild lives are net negative and we destroy everything by accident, I wouldnât count that as being âmoralâ because itâs not due to moral values. But the definition doesnât matter that much, though.
Still, Iâm not certain that the âvalue in the futureâ of industrial civilization (a different concept than humanity) will be so positive, when there are so many uncertainties (and that we could continue to expand even further factory farming).
I agree that most of the result ends up depending on the effects on wild animals. Always troublesome that so much of the impact depends on that when we have so many uncertainties.
We probably donât have the same definitionâif wild lives are net negative and we destroy everything by accident, I wouldnât count that as being âmoralâ because itâs not due to moral values. But the definition doesnât matter that much, though.
Still, Iâm not certain that the âvalue in the futureâ of industrial civilization (a different concept than humanity) will be so positive, when there are so many uncertainties (and that we could continue to expand even further factory farming).