Ah, see? The “world without men” idea was quickly down voted. No offense taken, this is completely normal. The concept is too far outside the current group consensus to ever be popular.
And yet, neither the down voters, nor anyone else I’ve discussed this with over a period of years, has been able to explain why they consider the marriage between violent men and an ever accelerating knowledge explosion to be sustainable.
People always hate the “world without men” idea, which is understandable, but they can’t explain what it is about the male gender that is so important that we should accept the horrific price tag male violence inflicts upon SO MANY innocent victims, over thousands of years.
What is it about the male gender that is so important that we should say goodbye to the many trillions of dollars which could be saved and reinvested if male violence didn’t exist?
To understand this concept it helps to flip it around and look at it from the opposite angle.
If you will, imagine that we had already transitioned to a world without men, 90%+ of human violence was ended, millions of innocents were liberated from unjust horrors, and we had trillions of dollars of new money available for further transforming the world for the better.
To complete the thought experiment, now imagine that somebody in that world at peace suggested that the men should be brought back, that they should return to today’s status quo.
Wouldn’t such a person be immediately declared insane?
Ah, see? The “world without men” idea was quickly down voted. No offense taken, this is completely normal. The concept is too far outside the current group consensus to ever be popular.
And yet, neither the down voters, nor anyone else I’ve discussed this with over a period of years, has been able to explain why they consider the marriage between violent men and an ever accelerating knowledge explosion to be sustainable.
People always hate the “world without men” idea, which is understandable, but they can’t explain what it is about the male gender that is so important that we should accept the horrific price tag male violence inflicts upon SO MANY innocent victims, over thousands of years.
What is it about the male gender that is so important that we should say goodbye to the many trillions of dollars which could be saved and reinvested if male violence didn’t exist?
To understand this concept it helps to flip it around and look at it from the opposite angle.
If you will, imagine that we had already transitioned to a world without men, 90%+ of human violence was ended, millions of innocents were liberated from unjust horrors, and we had trillions of dollars of new money available for further transforming the world for the better.
To complete the thought experiment, now imagine that somebody in that world at peace suggested that the men should be brought back, that they should return to today’s status quo.
Wouldn’t such a person be immediately declared insane?
If you want to hear a truly crackpot scheme....
Just watch the news.