We’re focused on AI safety, which no doubt is important. However, we should also consider the moral implications of potentially creating AI beings capable of:
a) thinking independently, i.e. beyond merely fulfilling human requests
b) setting their own goals
How can we ensure a future where humans and AI beings can co-exist, minimizing suffering for both and maximising the potential benefits of collaboration – from scientific discovery to solving global challenges?
Yep, seems important. But I don’t think this is particularly salient to the topic of the post: changes to AI safety priorities based on the new inference scaling paradigm.
We’re focused on AI safety, which no doubt is important. However, we should also consider the moral implications of potentially creating AI beings capable of:
a) thinking independently, i.e. beyond merely fulfilling human requests
b) setting their own goals
How can we ensure a future where humans and AI beings can co-exist, minimizing suffering for both and maximising the potential benefits of collaboration – from scientific discovery to solving global challenges?
Yep, seems important. But I don’t think this is particularly salient to the topic of the post: changes to AI safety priorities based on the new inference scaling paradigm.