I agree it would be better if the post explicitly compared the ex-ante and ex-post ways of looking at impact, but I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect the post make this distinction in its title.
I guess, though judging by the votes on your “I gave this a downvote for the clickbait title” it seems to me that a lot of us think you’re being unfair to the author.
I’m perfectly fine with holding an opinion that goes against the consensus. Maybe I could have worded it a bit better though? Happy to listen to any feedback on this.
I agree it would be better if the post explicitly compared the ex-ante and ex-post ways of looking at impact, but I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect the post make this distinction in its title.
I suppose at this stage it’s probably best to just agree to disagree.
I guess, though judging by the votes on your “I gave this a downvote for the clickbait title” it seems to me that a lot of us think you’re being unfair to the author.
I’m perfectly fine with holding an opinion that goes against the consensus. Maybe I could have worded it a bit better though? Happy to listen to any feedback on this.