I agree with just about everything in this comment :)
(Also re: Shapley values—I don’t actually have strong takes on these and you shouldn’t take this as a strong endorsement of them. I haven’t engaged with them beyond reading the post I linked. But they’re a way to get some handle on cases where many people contribute to an outcome, which addresses one of the points in your post.)
I’m skeptical that Shapley values can practically help us much in addressing the ‘conceptual problem’ raised by the post. See critique of estimated Shapley values in another comment on this post
Thanks for the considered and considerate discussion
I agree with just about everything in this comment :)
(Also re: Shapley values—I don’t actually have strong takes on these and you shouldn’t take this as a strong endorsement of them. I haven’t engaged with them beyond reading the post I linked. But they’re a way to get some handle on cases where many people contribute to an outcome, which addresses one of the points in your post.)
I’m skeptical that Shapley values can practically help us much in addressing the ‘conceptual problem’ raised by the post. See critique of estimated Shapley values in another comment on this post
Thanks for the considered and considerate discussion