I was just paraphrasing. You literally wrote “rationally resolve disagreements” which feels like the same thing to me as “rational dispute resolution”.
I edited my comment to quote you more literally since I think it maintains exactly the same semantic content.
We disagree about quotation norms. I believe this is important and I would be interested in discussing it. Would you be? We could both explain our norms (including beliefs about their importance or lack thereof) and try to understand the other person’s perspective.
I don’t know if we really disagree, but I’m not interested in talking about it. Seems extremely unlikely to be a discussion worth the effort to have since I don’t think either of us thinks making up deceptive quotes is okay. I think I’m just sloppier than you and that’s not interesting.
I was just paraphrasing. You literally wrote “rationally resolve disagreements” which feels like the same thing to me as “rational dispute resolution”.
I edited my comment to quote you more literally since I think it maintains exactly the same semantic content.
We disagree about quotation norms. I believe this is important and I would be interested in discussing it. Would you be? We could both explain our norms (including beliefs about their importance or lack thereof) and try to understand the other person’s perspective.
I don’t know if we really disagree, but I’m not interested in talking about it. Seems extremely unlikely to be a discussion worth the effort to have since I don’t think either of us thinks making up deceptive quotes is okay. I think I’m just sloppier than you and that’s not interesting.