Thanks for the reply. It’s not starting rumors to refer to information that is in the public domain, especially if that reference is heavily qualified as “an unverified suggestion” and the following point is clearly preceded by “If true”. Per Greg_Colbourn’s reply to me, however, I recognise that there is sensitivity about polyamory on this board.
I deliberately didn’t refer to polyamory because it wasn’t relevant to my point, which is that any kind of relationship between Ellison as CEO of Alameda and any senior staff member of FTX—and to be honest, even simply co-habitation—should be a huge red flag to anybody entrusting their money. Other comments have communicated that better than mine!
Thanks for the reply. It’s not starting rumors to refer to information that is in the public domain, especially if that reference is heavily qualified as “an unverified suggestion” and the following point is clearly preceded by “If true”. Per Greg_Colbourn’s reply to me, however, I recognise that there is sensitivity about polyamory on this board.
I deliberately didn’t refer to polyamory because it wasn’t relevant to my point, which is that any kind of relationship between Ellison as CEO of Alameda and any senior staff member of FTX—and to be honest, even simply co-habitation—should be a huge red flag to anybody entrusting their money. Other comments have communicated that better than mine!