Hi Luis, thanks for disambiguating between these two defintions! I found this post easy to read, clear and convincing.
When I was first started working on local priorities research, I definitely intended it to be what you call âContextualisation Researchâ, and projects that I ran focused on LPR were all CR related. I think (if Yi-Yang agrees with your proposal) it might be helpful to get the original LPR post re-named or add a disclaimer to the top to prevent people who are finding this later assuming that the original post only calls for âLPRâ as you define it.
The possibility of confusion is the worst thing about me using the term âlocal priorities researchâ to refer so something that was used in a broader sense before. My hunch is that itâs worth it, because it seems to me to be by far the most accurate description of what I call LPR. I really hope this wonât prove to be too confusing, and I wouldnât want to trouble those who have written before to make changes in response to this. But I think that in a number of cases the term was used to refer to both LPR and CR, in an ambiguous way.
My guess is that the best thing to do (if people agree with the distinction Iâve made) is to use LPR in the narrower sense from now on, and maybe making an edit or adding a comment explaining the usage of the term in past posts when authors see fit.
Hey Luis, to be clear, I agree with your post (and using a new nameâI like context-specific GPR).
My main proposal which may have been unclear is that you proactively reach out to folks who uses the old definition in their work, in case they donât see this post, and suggest they edit their posts.
Hi Luis, thanks for disambiguating between these two defintions! I found this post easy to read, clear and convincing.
When I was first started working on local priorities research, I definitely intended it to be what you call âContextualisation Researchâ, and projects that I ran focused on LPR were all CR related. I think (if Yi-Yang agrees with your proposal) it might be helpful to get the original LPR post re-named or add a disclaimer to the top to prevent people who are finding this later assuming that the original post only calls for âLPRâ as you define it.
Thanks, Vaidehi!
The possibility of confusion is the worst thing about me using the term âlocal priorities researchâ to refer so something that was used in a broader sense before. My hunch is that itâs worth it, because it seems to me to be by far the most accurate description of what I call LPR. I really hope this wonât prove to be too confusing, and I wouldnât want to trouble those who have written before to make changes in response to this. But I think that in a number of cases the term was used to refer to both LPR and CR, in an ambiguous way.
My guess is that the best thing to do (if people agree with the distinction Iâve made) is to use LPR in the narrower sense from now on, and maybe making an edit or adding a comment explaining the usage of the term in past posts when authors see fit.
Hey Luis, to be clear, I agree with your post (and using a new nameâI like context-specific GPR).
My main proposal which may have been unclear is that you proactively reach out to folks who uses the old definition in their work, in case they donât see this post, and suggest they edit their posts.