incorrectly claimed Nonlinear might be sponsored by Rethink Priorities, which you subsequently retracted.
This one seems unfair to include: he confirmed with a Rethink Priorities board member over texts first.
You’re right that that’s useful context to include. It weakens the signal of that example (and I’ll edit accordingly) but, I would argue, not so much that the example is worth excluding altogether.
This one seems unfair to include: he confirmed with a Rethink Priorities board member over texts first.
You’re right that that’s useful context to include. It weakens the signal of that example (and I’ll edit accordingly) but, I would argue, not so much that the example is worth excluding altogether.