If you have time, can you provide some examples of what you saw as evidence of wrongdoing?
I didn’t interpret any of these as evidence of the original wrongdoing, but these were the main things Kat did in her evidence thread that, in my opinion, muddled Nonlinear’s defense:
Lots of motte-and-bailey/strawmanning their critics, like claiming to refute an allegation but then providing evidence that they didn’t do some other, more egregious thing, or saying that the only way something bad could have come out of their actions was that they were “secretly evil”
Selectively engaging only with comments that made them look good, and avoiding responding to comments that looked more incriminating
Abuse of quotation marks, such that most of the time when they claimed someone else said something, the other person had not actually said that thing, but something else that sounded like it, modulo Kat’s interpretation.
There was also the section where they may have fabricated allegations against Ben Pace to make a point that anyone can make anyone else sound bad, though I thought the analogy did not quite work and some people thought was deranged. But I’m not sure if that part is substantiated or not, because she has avoided responding to questions about it.
Also, this was not in the forum thread, but Kat declaring victory on Facebook and saying she has changed everyone’s minds based on some questionable napkin math, while living in a bubble and engaging only with comments from people with whom she has shared the most flattering possible interpretation of events where people are witch hunting her for no reason.
I didn’t interpret any of these as evidence of the original wrongdoing, but these were the main things Kat did in her evidence thread that, in my opinion, muddled Nonlinear’s defense:
Lots of motte-and-bailey/strawmanning their critics, like claiming to refute an allegation but then providing evidence that they didn’t do some other, more egregious thing, or saying that the only way something bad could have come out of their actions was that they were “secretly evil”
Selectively engaging only with comments that made them look good, and avoiding responding to comments that looked more incriminating
Abuse of quotation marks, such that most of the time when they claimed someone else said something, the other person had not actually said that thing, but something else that sounded like it, modulo Kat’s interpretation.
There was also the section where they may have fabricated allegations against Ben Pace to make a point that anyone can make anyone else sound bad, though I thought the analogy did not quite work and some people thought was deranged. But I’m not sure if that part is substantiated or not, because she has avoided responding to questions about it.
Also, this was not in the forum thread, but Kat declaring victory on Facebook and saying she has changed everyone’s minds based on some questionable napkin math, while living in a bubble and engaging only with comments from people with whom she has shared the most flattering possible interpretation of events where people are witch hunting her for no reason.