Hi, some feedback on the visual side of the figures: The scaling feels really strange when a value 6-7 % shows as a ~70% piece of the total, especially given that later on, a value of 32 % is shown as ~85% piece of the total.
Only the last graph seems to actually be scaled to 100 % at the total.
I think the first two would be clearer with a full-scale reference bar and “zoom-in” indication that the following ones display a smaller percentage as their total. And I’d say the third one has big enough values to scale to 100 %.
The scaling feels really strange when a value 6-7 % shows as a ~70% piece of the total
I should put a clear ‘break indicator’ on the x-axis, perhaps? Atm the comparisons only make sense within graph. Or what would you suggest? Wouldn’t want to use up most of the page space for an ‘empty’ part of the graphing.
Group A: 0---> ______________________________________________________________________|
Group B: 0 -----------> _____________________________________________________________|
I was thinking maybe something like this − 1 extra bar with full scale and guiding lines capturing the proportion: 10 % Scale: 0--------|______________________________________________________________________| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ↓ ↓ Group A: 0------------------------------------------------________________________________| Group B: 0--------------------------------------------------------________________________|
Or even just a down-open horizontal curly bracket (“top curly bracket”) above the charts:
10 % ⏞ <---HTML code of the top curly bracket symbol Group A: 0------------------------------------------------________________________________| Group B: 0--------------------------------------------------------________________________|
Hi, some feedback on the visual side of the figures:
The scaling feels really strange when a value 6-7 % shows as a ~70% piece of the total, especially given that later on, a value of 32 % is shown as ~85% piece of the total.
Only the last graph seems to actually be scaled to 100 % at the total.
I think the first two would be clearer with a full-scale reference bar and “zoom-in” indication that the following ones display a smaller percentage as their total.
And I’d say the third one has big enough values to scale to 100 %.
Thank you.
I should put a clear ‘break indicator’ on the x-axis, perhaps? Atm the comparisons only make sense within graph. Or what would you suggest? Wouldn’t want to use up most of the page space for an ‘empty’ part of the graphing.
Group A: 0---> ______________________________________________________________________|
Group B: 0 -----------> _____________________________________________________________|
… would seem to waste space
I was thinking maybe something like this − 1 extra bar with full scale and guiding lines capturing the proportion:
10 %
Scale: 0--------|______________________________________________________________________|
. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
↓ ↓
Group A: 0------------------------------------------------________________________________|
Group B: 0--------------------------------------------------------________________________|
Or even just a down-open horizontal curly bracket (“top curly bracket”) above the charts:
10 %
⏞ <---HTML code of the top curly bracket symbol
Group A: 0------------------------------------------------________________________________|
Group B: 0--------------------------------------------------------________________________|