I think the article does support the title. By my read, the post is arguing:
many EAs claim that EAs should have high risk tolerance (as in, more risk tolerance than individual investors)
but these arguments are not as strong as people claim, so we shouldn’t say EAs should have high risk tolerance
(I read “much” in the title as a synonym for “high”, I personally would have used the word “high” but I have no problem with the title.)
I agree that short posts are generally better, I did find this post long (I reviewed it before publication and it took me about 10 hours) but it’s not clear to me how to make it shorter because it’s addressing a lot of arguments. I agree with Charles Dillon’s comment that there should be a summary at the top briefly covering all the arguments, I think that would help (sadly I didn’t think of that when reviewing).
but these arguments are not as strong as people claim, so we shouldn’t say EAs should have high risk tolerance
I don’t get the same impression from reading the post especially in light of the conclusions, which even without my adjustments seems in favour of taking more risk.
I think the article does support the title. By my read, the post is arguing:
many EAs claim that EAs should have high risk tolerance (as in, more risk tolerance than individual investors)
but these arguments are not as strong as people claim, so we shouldn’t say EAs should have high risk tolerance
(I read “much” in the title as a synonym for “high”, I personally would have used the word “high” but I have no problem with the title.)
I agree that short posts are generally better, I did find this post long (I reviewed it before publication and it took me about 10 hours) but it’s not clear to me how to make it shorter because it’s addressing a lot of arguments. I agree with Charles Dillon’s comment that there should be a summary at the top briefly covering all the arguments, I think that would help (sadly I didn’t think of that when reviewing).
I don’t get the same impression from reading the post especially in light of the conclusions, which even without my adjustments seems in favour of taking more risk.