I think talent pool doesn’t /​quite/​ capture things like entrepreneurs and field builders and people who are building things.
Error checkers is good, but also something like finding cause x isn’t quite error checking. It’s more like avoiding the risk of omission kind of stuff /​ rethinking fundamental assumptions.
I think my problem with this question, which I’ve been thinking about in maybe different ways for many years, is that there isn’t a binary between community member and [core ea decision maker /​ etc.] - it’s very much a continuum and people occupy multiple roles at once. This becomes complicated because you can’t quite set boundaries the same way.
For example, if a community member starts their own grantmaking foundation, are they still a community members or a decision maker? Does it only count if they know the right people or are in a certain cause area? How do their responsibilities change (or not change)?
I think talent pool doesn’t /​quite/​ capture things like entrepreneurs and field builders and people who are building things.
Error checkers is good, but also something like finding cause x isn’t quite error checking. It’s more like avoiding the risk of omission kind of stuff /​ rethinking fundamental assumptions.
I think my problem with this question, which I’ve been thinking about in maybe different ways for many years, is that there isn’t a binary between community member and [core ea decision maker /​ etc.] - it’s very much a continuum and people occupy multiple roles at once. This becomes complicated because you can’t quite set boundaries the same way.
For example, if a community member starts their own grantmaking foundation, are they still a community members or a decision maker? Does it only count if they know the right people or are in a certain cause area? How do their responsibilities change (or not change)?