I think your comment and sentiment is great. My response wasn’t directly related.
I guess I’m more concerned about “by catch” or overindexing. For example, activity and discussions that are wobbly about getting into management and scaling, “Great Leap Forward”, sort of style.
Honestly, the root issue here is that I have some distrust related to the causes and processes about this post, the NB post, all of which seems to be related to discussion and concerns that might originated or closely involve the EA forum. I am don’t think these have the best relationship to reality[1]. It seems healthy for the issues to settle down.
I think the discourse on funding/optics has been slightly defective or tinged. This caused Will, SBF to pop onto the forum. This presence is fantastic, great and should continue, but maybe in this instance, different processes or events could have occurred, so they could have used their valuable time and public presence to communicate to EA about something else.
I think your comment and sentiment is great. My response wasn’t directly related.
I guess I’m more concerned about “by catch” or overindexing. For example, activity and discussions that are wobbly about getting into management and scaling, “Great Leap Forward”, sort of style.
Honestly, the root issue here is that I have some distrust related to the causes and processes about this post, the NB post, all of which seems to be related to discussion and concerns that might originated or closely involve the EA forum. I am don’t think these have the best relationship to reality[1]. It seems healthy for the issues to settle down.
I think the discourse on funding/optics has been slightly defective or tinged. This caused Will, SBF to pop onto the forum. This presence is fantastic, great and should continue, but maybe in this instance, different processes or events could have occurred, so they could have used their valuable time and public presence to communicate to EA about something else.