I already give everything, except whatās required for the bare living necessities, away. The analysis is warranted seeing as the cost-effectiveness is so high (see other comment) and analyzing which intervention is higher impact is just a general ethical/āEA practice, even when we arenāt talking about ~15 QALYs
EDIT: This is not as impressive as it seems at first glance. Iām a student so I only buy cheap things anyways (which means I get a modest-proposal-esque thought every time e.g. This 30 dollar jacket costs as much as curing one person of blindness). Weāll see how I behave if I ever get some large amount of money.
I see. Well, that changes my perspective. Originally, I assumed that you did not give away everything except for what is necessary to live. With the context that you are giving maximally, then donating your liver or kidney can go beyond that so it makes more sense why you are asking the question. I donāt think analyzing QALYs is strange generally.
I want to gently push back on this being more EA than not undergoing surgery and removing important parts of oneās body. I think you might be influenced a lot by your feelings (I know I am despite trying to be rationalāI am rational about how irrational I am!). Therefore, I could imagine myself in your situation feeling a strong pull to be an organ donor because you feel like you are not giving enough otherwise. I therefore strongly advice to wait a few years after you have graduated and you have a comfortable, stable income. This way you will have compassion for your future self which is likely to most of the time have a stable and comfortable incomeāthe student years pass quickly! Take care of yourself whatever you do, this is a marathon, not a sprint (unless we are unlucky with AGI timelines and alignment).
I mean itās not an important body part, you can live perfectly well with only one kidney, which is why Iām giving it away. If by some cruel twist of fate I do end up needing another kidney, Iāll be on the top of the recipient list thanks to my donation.
I think you might be influenced a lot by your feelings
Of course I am, empathy is a feeling after all. I donāt see why this is a reason to not do it.
wait a few years after you have graduated and you have a comfortable, stable income
I will not do the procedure during the school year, and will take as long as I need to recover afterwards. Iād prefer to do it sooner rather than later, since earlier interventions are almost always better than later interventions due to the higher amount of knock on effects (e.g. if I convince someone to be vegan now itās better than years in the future, since Iām saving the animals in the intervening years). Also I study ethics, so a ācomfortable stable incomeā is probably not happening anyways :)
I already give everything, except whatās required for the bare living necessities, away.
While admirable consider whether this is healthy or sustainable. I think donating less is ok, thatās why Giving what we can suggests 10% as a calibrated point. You can of course donate more, but I would recommend against the implied current situation.
I already give everything, except whatās required for the bare living necessities, away. The analysis is warranted seeing as the cost-effectiveness is so high (see other comment) and analyzing which intervention is higher impact is just a general ethical/āEA practice, even when we arenāt talking about ~15 QALYs
EDIT: This is not as impressive as it seems at first glance. Iām a student so I only buy cheap things anyways (which means I get a modest-proposal-esque thought every time e.g. This 30 dollar jacket costs as much as curing one person of blindness). Weāll see how I behave if I ever get some large amount of money.
I see. Well, that changes my perspective. Originally, I assumed that you did not give away everything except for what is necessary to live. With the context that you are giving maximally, then donating your liver or kidney can go beyond that so it makes more sense why you are asking the question. I donāt think analyzing QALYs is strange generally.
You are quite the EA! Congrats
I want to gently push back on this being more EA than not undergoing surgery and removing important parts of oneās body. I think you might be influenced a lot by your feelings (I know I am despite trying to be rationalāI am rational about how irrational I am!). Therefore, I could imagine myself in your situation feeling a strong pull to be an organ donor because you feel like you are not giving enough otherwise. I therefore strongly advice to wait a few years after you have graduated and you have a comfortable, stable income. This way you will have compassion for your future self which is likely to most of the time have a stable and comfortable incomeāthe student years pass quickly! Take care of yourself whatever you do, this is a marathon, not a sprint (unless we are unlucky with AGI timelines and alignment).
I mean itās not an important body part, you can live perfectly well with only one kidney, which is why Iām giving it away. If by some cruel twist of fate I do end up needing another kidney, Iāll be on the top of the recipient list thanks to my donation.
Of course I am, empathy is a feeling after all. I donāt see why this is a reason to not do it.
I will not do the procedure during the school year, and will take as long as I need to recover afterwards. Iād prefer to do it sooner rather than later, since earlier interventions are almost always better than later interventions due to the higher amount of knock on effects (e.g. if I convince someone to be vegan now itās better than years in the future, since Iām saving the animals in the intervening years). Also I study ethics, so a ācomfortable stable incomeā is probably not happening anyways :)
While admirable consider whether this is healthy or sustainable. I think donating less is ok, thatās why Giving what we can suggests 10% as a calibrated point. You can of course donate more, but I would recommend against the implied current situation.