You mean not publishing the truth? No I think that’s is bad, it’s more difficult to counter vaccine skepticism when organizations are not public and transparent, at least I don’t see any reason to think not.
Well whatever one may think of it, the EMA had legitimate concerns, and was not merely dragging its feet for negotiation reasons as the OP implied.
You mean not publishing the truth? No I think that’s is bad, it’s more difficult to counter vaccine skepticism when organizations are not public and transparent, at least I don’t see any reason to think not.
Well whatever one may think of it, the EMA had legitimate concerns, and was not merely dragging its feet for negotiation reasons as the OP implied.