Thanks for the comment, Karthik! I strongly upvoted it. I have changed “expected value” to “expected utility” in this post, and updated to the following the last paragraph of the comment of mine you linked to.
I reject risk aversion with respect to impartial welfare (although it makes all sense to be risk averse with respect to money), as I do not see why the value of additional welfare would decrease with welfare.
Thanks for the comment, Karthik! I strongly upvoted it. I have changed “expected value” to “expected utility” in this post, and updated to the following the last paragraph of the comment of mine you linked to.