“Nominees must meet the following requirements to be eligible … ”
“Legal residents of one (1) of the fifty (50) United States or the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or Canada (excluding Quebec) (“Territory”)”
“A creator or founder of a social impact organization (“Organization”) that … Has a primary objective related to improving health, education, or esteem or to leadership development and serves low- and middle-income women and/or children in the Territory. (The Organization may have tangential operations outside of the Territory, but, to be eligible for this contest, its core mission and programming must be directed within the Territory.)
The eligibility criteria seems to rule out nearly all EA-aligned organizations:
“Nominees must meet the following requirements to be eligible … ”
“Legal residents of one (1) of the fifty (50) United States or the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or Canada (excluding Quebec) (“Territory”)”
“A creator or founder of a social impact organization (“Organization”) that … Has a primary objective related to improving health, education, or esteem or to leadership development and serves low- and middle-income women and/or children in the Territory. (The Organization may have tangential operations outside of the Territory, but, to be eligible for this contest, its core mission and programming must be directed within the Territory.)
Yeah, I don’t know of any EA organisations that primarily serve North American women and children.