MIRI, in collaboration with CFAR, runs a series of four-day workshop/camps, the AI Risk for Computer Scientists workshops, which gather mathematicians/computer scientists who are potentially interested in the issue in one place to learn and interact. This sort of workshop seems very valuable to me as an on-ramp for technically talented researchers, which is one of the major bottlenecks in my mind.
Curious why CFAR wasn’t included in the review as a standalone org, given your high opinion of AIRCS workshops?
Curious why CFAR wasn’t included in the review as a standalone org, given your high opinion of AIRCS workshops?
Some more context in this comment.