This is really strong, surprised I didn’t see it before! This is the sort of work I’m hoping to do/coalesce in the “Increasing effective charitable giving” synthesis (but with a focus on the particular effectiveness-relevant stuff) … and also in innovationsinfundraising.org, an earlier project.
I haven’t read your full write-up, but what I see makes this my ‘go-to’ response on the ‘matching donations’ questions that comes up all the time.
I was going to make the point that @cflexman does below: introducing a “you can offer a match policy” might increase net donations if we also consider the impact of such a policy on the donations of the person induced to do the matching.
This is really strong, surprised I didn’t see it before! This is the sort of work I’m hoping to do/coalesce in the “Increasing effective charitable giving” synthesis (but with a focus on the particular effectiveness-relevant stuff) … and also in innovationsinfundraising.org, an earlier project.
I haven’t read your full write-up, but what I see makes this my ‘go-to’ response on the ‘matching donations’ questions that comes up all the time.
I was going to make the point that @cflexman does below: introducing a “you can offer a match policy” might increase net donations if we also consider the impact of such a policy on the donations of the person induced to do the matching.