Anthropic arenât objecting to killbots as a matter of principle though, they are just saying the tech isnât reliable yet. The stand on surveillance seems principled and I absolutely admire Amodei for risking his business to do the right thing, but letâs avoid deceiving ourselves about what his stance actually is.
Amodei is not writing a paper to be published in Philosophy and Public Affairs. He is responding to an insane government official serving as the secretary of âwarâ of the worldâs most powerful nation. What do you expect him to say? What would you have said?
Anthropic arenât objecting to killbots as a matter of principle though, they are just saying the tech isnât reliable yet. The stand on surveillance seems principled and I absolutely admire Amodei for risking his business to do the right thing, but letâs avoid deceiving ourselves about what his stance actually is.
Amodei is not writing a paper to be published in Philosophy and Public Affairs. He is responding to an insane government official serving as the secretary of âwarâ of the worldâs most powerful nation. What do you expect him to say? What would you have said?