Hi Cameron :) thanks for replying! I am concerned that the question is double-barreled. Are you? (i.e. a survey question that actually asks about two different things, but only allows for one answer. This can be confusing for respondents and lead to inaccurate data).
Hi Yanni, this is definitely an important consideration in general. Our goal was basically to probe whether alignment researchers think the status quo of rapid capabilities progress is acceptable/appropriate/safe or not. Definitely agree that for those interested, eg, in understanding whether alignment researchers support a full-blown pause OR just a dramatic slowing of capabilities progress, this question would be insufficiently vague. But for our purposes, having the ‘or’ statement doesn’t really change what we were fundamentally attempting to probe.
Hi Cameron :) thanks for replying! I am concerned that the question is double-barreled. Are you? (i.e. a survey question that actually asks about two different things, but only allows for one answer. This can be confusing for respondents and lead to inaccurate data).
Hi Yanni, this is definitely an important consideration in general. Our goal was basically to probe whether alignment researchers think the status quo of rapid capabilities progress is acceptable/appropriate/safe or not. Definitely agree that for those interested, eg, in understanding whether alignment researchers support a full-blown pause OR just a dramatic slowing of capabilities progress, this question would be insufficiently vague. But for our purposes, having the ‘or’ statement doesn’t really change what we were fundamentally attempting to probe.