but I find it somewhat odd that he starts with arguments that seem weak to me, and only in the middle did he get around to claims that are relevant to whether the hotel is better than a random group of EAs.
The post is organized by dependency not by strength of argument. First people have to convinced that funding projects make sense at all (given that there’s so much grant money already in EA) before we can talk about the way in which to fund them.
The post is organized by dependency not by strength of argument. First people have to convinced that funding projects make sense at all (given that there’s so much grant money already in EA) before we can talk about the way in which to fund them.