This post seems very reasonable, and I don’t understand why it is on −6 karma.
I think these kinds of updates on organisations are important for many community members (particularly donors); I don’t think it was overly harsh towards GiveDirectly or misleadingly representing the scale of the problem.
I downvoted because the post doesn’t seem to show a good understanding of what GiveDirectly is already doing about fraud and it doesn’t appear that the offer gave GiveDirectly a chance to comment.
This post seems very reasonable, and I don’t understand why it is on −6 karma.
I think these kinds of updates on organisations are important for many community members (particularly donors); I don’t think it was overly harsh towards GiveDirectly or misleadingly representing the scale of the problem.
I downvoted because the post doesn’t seem to show a good understanding of what GiveDirectly is already doing about fraud and it doesn’t appear that the offer gave GiveDirectly a chance to comment.