My definition of going well for humans: for the existing population, there would be a re-allocation of resources. Food and water would be rationally distributed based on basic needs, and once basic needs are all met, based on wealth (or the ability to generate progress for the society).
With this as a premise, I think 1) there would be no need for factory farming, and 2) the welfare of all, including animals, would be rebalanced.
For point 2), I very much think the lack of welfare of animals is reflective of the lack of welfare in humans themselves
My definition of going well for humans: for the existing population, there would be a re-allocation of resources. Food and water would be rationally distributed based on basic needs, and once basic needs are all met, based on wealth (or the ability to generate progress for the society).
With this as a premise, I think 1) there would be no need for factory farming, and 2) the welfare of all, including animals, would be rebalanced.
For point 2), I very much think the lack of welfare of animals is reflective of the lack of welfare in humans themselves