Our best calculations show that for every $1 of funding received, we have potentially helped improve the lives of 5,423 fish and 221,343 shrimp directly through our engagement with these certifiers.
[...]
In 2024, we aim to further refine and organize these estimates based on region, species, welfare intervention, etc.
I think it would be nice if you could move to cost-effectiveness estimates in terms of improved living time per $, as Saulius did for corporate campaigns. Have you considered collaborating with the Welfare Footprint Project to quantify the time spent in various types of pain in the standard and improved conditions?
Thanks for sharing, Tessa!
I think it would be nice if you could move to cost-effectiveness estimates in terms of improved living time per $, as Saulius did for corporate campaigns. Have you considered collaborating with the Welfare Footprint Project to quantify the time spent in various types of pain in the standard and improved conditions?