Also: what about just explicitly criminalizing a) a first strike, b) a nuclear attack? The idea is to make it more likely that the individuals who participated in a nuclear strike would be punished—even if they considered it to be morally justified.
(Someone will certainly think this is “serious April Fool’s stuff”)
BTW, I have recently learned that ICJ missed an opportunity to explicitly state that using nukes (or at least a first strike) is a violation of international law.
Also: what about just explicitly criminalizing a) a first strike, b) a nuclear attack? The idea is to make it more likely that the individuals who participated in a nuclear strike would be punished—even if they considered it to be morally justified.
(Someone will certainly think this is “serious April Fool’s stuff”)
Good point. My implicit idea was to have the money in an independent trust, so that the “punishment” is easier to enforce.
BTW, I have recently learned that ICJ missed an opportunity to explicitly state that using nukes (or at least a first strike) is a violation of international law.