Yes, that was also what I intended to communicate with “productive party”. Thanks for the response and especially the examples about Estonia and expert parliamentarians.
A related thought: the more that parties are able to productively contribute to discussions, the more productive the discussions will be and feel, and the more likely a cooperative atmosphere can be maintained. Might be another reason why increasing AI governance expertise of the EU could be really helpful, as it seems very likely to me that the EU will be involved in many important discussions on AI governance.
Yes, that was also what I intended to communicate with “productive party”. Thanks for the response and especially the examples about Estonia and expert parliamentarians.
A related thought: the more that parties are able to productively contribute to discussions, the more productive the discussions will be and feel, and the more likely a cooperative atmosphere can be maintained. Might be another reason why increasing AI governance expertise of the EU could be really helpful, as it seems very likely to me that the EU will be involved in many important discussions on AI governance.
That’s a good point