you say describe yourself as having two kinds of concerns, the ones about the content being more serious. However, in your comments here, you describe your “primary concern” as the nature of the content
These are entirely compatible. I had and have multiple concerns, and described the one I was most worried about as my “primary concern”. There’s no contradiction here.
This to me seems a classical example of bikeshedding
In this case it’s more of a motte-and-motte, with the document authors agreeing to focus on motte-A because we didn’t have consensus that motte-B should be defended.
(I also appreciate Gregory’s response to your comment.)
These are entirely compatible. I had and have multiple concerns, and described the one I was most worried about as my “primary concern”. There’s no contradiction here.
I think you’re confused about what bikeshedding means: http://bikeshed.org/
In this case it’s more of a motte-and-motte, with the document authors agreeing to focus on motte-A because we didn’t have consensus that motte-B should be defended.
(I also appreciate Gregory’s response to your comment.)