Strongly upvoted for the explanation and demonstration of how important peer-review by subject matter experts is. I obviously can’t evaluate either HLI’s work or your review, but I think this is indeed a general problem of EA where the culture is, for some reason, aversive to standard practices of scientific publishing. This has to be rectified.
Strongly upvoted for the explanation and demonstration of how important peer-review by subject matter experts is. I obviously can’t evaluate either HLI’s work or your review, but I think this is indeed a general problem of EA where the culture is, for some reason, aversive to standard practices of scientific publishing. This has to be rectified.
I think it’s because the standard practices of scientific publishing are very laborious and EA wants to be a bit more agile.
Having said that I strongly agree that more peer-review is called for in EA, even if we don’t move all the way to the extreme of the academic world.