If we’re choosing between trying to improve Vox vs trying to discredit Vox, I think EA goals are served better by the former.
Tractability matters. Scott Alexander has been critiquing Vox for years. It might be that improving Vox is a less tractable goal than getting EAs to share their articles less.
they went out on a limb to hire Piper, and they’ve sacrificed some readership to maintain EA fidelity.
My understanding is that Future Perfect is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Without knowing the terms of their funding, I think it’s hard to ascribe either virtue or vice to Vox. For example, if the Rockefeller Foundation is paying them per content item in the “Future Perfect” vertical, I could ascribe vice to Vox by saying that they are churning out subpar EA content in order to improve their bottom line.
Tractability matters. Scott Alexander has been critiquing Vox for years. It might be that improving Vox is a less tractable goal than getting EAs to share their articles less.
My understanding is that Future Perfect is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Without knowing the terms of their funding, I think it’s hard to ascribe either virtue or vice to Vox. For example, if the Rockefeller Foundation is paying them per content item in the “Future Perfect” vertical, I could ascribe vice to Vox by saying that they are churning out subpar EA content in order to improve their bottom line.