Thanks Jamie! We struggled a lot with this issue when writing the post.
Iâm not really sure I see a problem or a difference with the âwhich megaproject ideas can we think of?â/â âhow rapidly will we get diminishing returns on further investment in various plausibly cost-effective project ideas?â distinction. I think if the answer to the second question is âquickly and with only a few million $â then you cut the idea from the list. Itâs part of the way to arrive at answers to âwhich megaproject ideas can we think of?â. Other ideas floated seemed like they would be cost-effective at a small scale but could never absorb $10M because the problem was so small (foie gras bans perhaps) or the low-hanging fruit was uniquely cheap (the first type of a new campaign in a new region/âspecies but hit some blockers or severe diminishing returns as they try to scale), and other ideas didnât look cost-effective at a small scale only but maybe at large scale if they reach some sort of economies of scale (some sort of policy or subsidization schemes that only gain leverage at large scales).
On the specific example you highlighted, I think âalmost any animal charityâ would have more weight as a critique if there were many such opportunities. I think the N of animal charities pursuing interventions that could actually both scale & remain cost-effective is relatively small (I donât see orgs like FWI and Healthier Hens popping up without the deliberate effort of Charity Entrepreneurship and itâs still to be proven if they can scale and remain cost-effective. Even larger orgs like CIWF & THL arenât obviously only doing cost-effective things). The two we cited (focusing on shrimp and farmed insects) were deliberate because the sheer number of animals affected provide the opportunity that cost-effectiveness could be maintained even if spending a lot of money, unlike other animal charities.
I agree not all the items on the list will turn out to meet strict definitions, or even vague definitions, of megaprojects. The main point of the exercise here was to note the virtual lack of any ideas on animals and prompt discussion and interest, and secondly to actually propose ideas from among which further investigation might find some really compelling megaprojects.
Thanks Jamie! We struggled a lot with this issue when writing the post.
Iâm not really sure I see a problem or a difference with the âwhich megaproject ideas can we think of?â/â âhow rapidly will we get diminishing returns on further investment in various plausibly cost-effective project ideas?â distinction. I think if the answer to the second question is âquickly and with only a few million $â then you cut the idea from the list. Itâs part of the way to arrive at answers to âwhich megaproject ideas can we think of?â. Other ideas floated seemed like they would be cost-effective at a small scale but could never absorb $10M because the problem was so small (foie gras bans perhaps) or the low-hanging fruit was uniquely cheap (the first type of a new campaign in a new region/âspecies but hit some blockers or severe diminishing returns as they try to scale), and other ideas didnât look cost-effective at a small scale only but maybe at large scale if they reach some sort of economies of scale (some sort of policy or subsidization schemes that only gain leverage at large scales).
On the specific example you highlighted, I think âalmost any animal charityâ would have more weight as a critique if there were many such opportunities. I think the N of animal charities pursuing interventions that could actually both scale & remain cost-effective is relatively small (I donât see orgs like FWI and Healthier Hens popping up without the deliberate effort of Charity Entrepreneurship and itâs still to be proven if they can scale and remain cost-effective. Even larger orgs like CIWF & THL arenât obviously only doing cost-effective things). The two we cited (focusing on shrimp and farmed insects) were deliberate because the sheer number of animals affected provide the opportunity that cost-effectiveness could be maintained even if spending a lot of money, unlike other animal charities.
I agree not all the items on the list will turn out to meet strict definitions, or even vague definitions, of megaprojects. The main point of the exercise here was to note the virtual lack of any ideas on animals and prompt discussion and interest, and secondly to actually propose ideas from among which further investigation might find some really compelling megaprojects.