Thanks for the thoughtful response. I’m not familiar enough with the scientific principles to make confident comparisons, but I can imagine that studies quantifying cage-free suffering reduction are less compelling than the examples that I gave.
I think that adjusting your presentation to the audience you want to convince makes sense. And It’s great to hear you’re speaking to the abolitionist activist community—since you have firsthand experience in that world but also seem familiar with EA communities, you probably have a unique perspective to bring back to the abolitionist activists and the knowledge of that community to communicate it in a way that connects with them.
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I’m not familiar enough with the scientific principles to make confident comparisons, but I can imagine that studies quantifying cage-free suffering reduction are less compelling than the examples that I gave.
I think that adjusting your presentation to the audience you want to convince makes sense. And It’s great to hear you’re speaking to the abolitionist activist community—since you have firsthand experience in that world but also seem familiar with EA communities, you probably have a unique perspective to bring back to the abolitionist activists and the knowledge of that community to communicate it in a way that connects with them.
I wish I was a sandcastle :)