Small suggestion: Could someone edit the post so that the hover footnotes work; makes it more readable? (Update: More importantly I’m not sure the footnote numbers are correct.)
Larger suggestion: This is a great post and provides a lot of methodological tools. I’d love to see it continue to be improved. E.g., detailed annotation, here or elsewhere, with the reasoning behind each element of the model.
It might help to turn the modeling part into a separate post linked to this one?
I have some ‘point by point’ questions and comments, particularly on the justification for the elements of the simple models. I don’t want to add them all here because of the clutter, so I will add them as public https://hypothes.is/ notes. Unless anyone has a better suggestion for how to discuss this?
Small suggestion: Could someone edit the post so that the hover footnotes work; makes it more readable? (Update: More importantly I’m not sure the footnote numbers are correct.)
Larger suggestion: This is a great post and provides a lot of methodological tools. I’d love to see it continue to be improved. E.g., detailed annotation, here or elsewhere, with the reasoning behind each element of the model.
It might help to turn the modeling part into a separate post linked to this one?
I have some ‘point by point’ questions and comments, particularly on the justification for the elements of the simple models. I don’t want to add them all here because of the clutter, so I will add them as public https://hypothes.is/ notes. Unless anyone has a better suggestion for how to discuss this?