Hm, curious how specifically this differs from GiveWell.
They just say whether the charity is using an evidence-backed intervention or not, rather than trying to find the most effective organisation.
In particular, they apply this across all causes, providing options for donors out of global health and cash transfers.
Sorry I didn’t respond sooner, but yeah, Ben seems right from what my colleague who’s running it says.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Hm, curious how specifically this differs from GiveWell.
They just say whether the charity is using an evidence-backed intervention or not, rather than trying to find the most effective organisation.
In particular, they apply this across all causes, providing options for donors out of global health and cash transfers.
Sorry I didn’t respond sooner, but yeah, Ben seems right from what my colleague who’s running it says.