If you are writing a summary of existing arguments, then yes. But if you have a new argument, then there is no reason to drown it in old arguments.
That’s true, but then you can’t claim to say where the balance lies—you’re just adding one new brick to the wall.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
If you are writing a summary of existing arguments, then yes. But if you have a new argument, then there is no reason to drown it in old arguments.
That’s true, but then you can’t claim to say where the balance lies—you’re just adding one new brick to the wall.