I applied for a research role at GWWC a few years ago (?2015 or so), and wasnât selected. I now do research at FHI.
In the interim I worked as a public health doctor. Although I think this helped me âimproveâ in a variety of respects, âlevelling up for an EA research roleâ wasnât the purpose in mind: I was expecting to continue as a PH doctor rather than âswitching acrossâ to EA research in the future; if I was offered the role at GWWC, Iâm not sure whether I would have taken it.
Thereâs a couple of points Iâd want to emphasise.
1. Per Khorton, I think most of the most valuable roles (certainly in my âfieldâ but I suspect in many others, especially the more applied/âconcrete) will not be at âavowedly EA organisationsâ. Thus, depending on what contributions you want to make, âEA employmentâ may not be the best thing to aim for.
2. Pragmatically, âavowedly EA organisation rolesâ (especially in research) tend oversubscribed and highly competitive. Thus (notwithstanding the above) this is ones primary target, it seems wise to have a career plan which does not rely on securing such a role (or at least have a backup).
3. Although thereâs a sense of ways one can build âEA street credâ (or whatever), itâs not clear these forms of âEA career capitalâ are best even for employment at avowedly EA organisations. Iâd guess my current role owes more to (e.g.) my medical and public health background than it does to my forum oeuvre (such as it is).
most of the most valuable roles (certainly in my âfieldâ but I suspect in many others, especially the more applied/âconcrete) will not be at âavowedly EA organisationsâ
do you have an example?
it seems wise to have a career plan which does not rely on securing such a role (or at least have a backup).
Agreed that I should have a backup. But why does it seem unwise? Based on what? Have you looked at the possible impact based on replaceability and displacement chains?
What else is there to do I donât know, other than working in some form (researcher, program manager) in âorgs that do goodâ? I think I can ETG (in the US) but owing to my lack of citizenship there is a 50% chance (H1B and RFE issues) that I make it just considering just random factors. This is still my back up.
Although thereâs a sense of ways one can build âEA street credâ (or whatever), itâs not clear these forms of âEA career capitalâ are best even for employment at avowedly EA organisations.
I am never going to be able to find what the best way to âEA CCâ for EA orgs. Alternate being I look at examples. What do you suggest to do then and why?
I applied for a research role at GWWC a few years ago (?2015 or so), and wasnât selected. I now do research at FHI.
In the interim I worked as a public health doctor. Although I think this helped me âimproveâ in a variety of respects, âlevelling up for an EA research roleâ wasnât the purpose in mind: I was expecting to continue as a PH doctor rather than âswitching acrossâ to EA research in the future; if I was offered the role at GWWC, Iâm not sure whether I would have taken it.
Thereâs a couple of points Iâd want to emphasise.
1. Per Khorton, I think most of the most valuable roles (certainly in my âfieldâ but I suspect in many others, especially the more applied/âconcrete) will not be at âavowedly EA organisationsâ. Thus, depending on what contributions you want to make, âEA employmentâ may not be the best thing to aim for.
2. Pragmatically, âavowedly EA organisation rolesâ (especially in research) tend oversubscribed and highly competitive. Thus (notwithstanding the above) this is ones primary target, it seems wise to have a career plan which does not rely on securing such a role (or at least have a backup).
3. Although thereâs a sense of ways one can build âEA street credâ (or whatever), itâs not clear these forms of âEA career capitalâ are best even for employment at avowedly EA organisations. Iâd guess my current role owes more to (e.g.) my medical and public health background than it does to my forum oeuvre (such as it is).
Thanks for the suggestions.
do you have an example?
Agreed that I should have a backup. But why does it seem unwise? Based on what? Have you looked at the possible impact based on replaceability and displacement chains?
What else is there to do I donât know, other than working in some form (researcher, program manager) in âorgs that do goodâ? I think I can ETG (in the US) but owing to my lack of citizenship there is a 50% chance (H1B and RFE issues) that I make it just considering just random factors. This is still my back up.
I am never going to be able to find what the best way to âEA CCâ for EA orgs. Alternate being I look at examples. What do you suggest to do then and why?