Global health is a 21 on 80,000 Hours’ list, and you’re recommending updating climate change to 26. This suggests it’s several orders of magnitude better to spend resources to fight climate change than to donate those resources to GiveDirectly, say. This seems to contradict the conclusion of the linked EA forum post.
You also mention donating to charities like Cool Earth. It would be good to know how they compare to GiveWell’s recommended charities.
Seconding StevenKaas. In particular, there’s this recent post: https://​​forum.effectivealtruism.org/​​posts/​​GEM7iJnLeMkTMRAaf/​​updated-global-development-interventions-are-generally-more
Global health is a 21 on 80,000 Hours’ list, and you’re recommending updating climate change to 26. This suggests it’s several orders of magnitude better to spend resources to fight climate change than to donate those resources to GiveDirectly, say. This seems to contradict the conclusion of the linked EA forum post.
You also mention donating to charities like Cool Earth. It would be good to know how they compare to GiveWell’s recommended charities.