And even when you can multiply the three quantities together, I feel like speaking in terms of importance, neglectedness and tractability might make you feel that there is no total ordering of intervention (“some have higher importance, some have higher tractability, whether you prefer one or the other is a matter a personal taste”)
I don’t follow this. If you multiply I*T*N and get ‘good done/additional resources’, how is that not an ordering?
I don’t follow this. If you multiply I*T*N and get ‘good done/additional resources’, how is that not an ordering?
That’s an ordering!
It’s mostly analyses like the ones of 80k Hours, which do not multiply the three together, which might let you think there is no ordering.
Is there a way I can make that more precise?