I was imagining you could use the tools to assess peopleās views about cause prioritization! In particular, Iām not sure whether you record usersā responses when they use either tool, but Iād be interested in seeing these data. It may also be valuable to recruit a more representative sample to see how most people react to moral uncertainty or otherwise engage with the tools.
Of course, I think a limitation in both these cases is that most people are pretty unfamiliar with moral uncertainty, and so a) probably a lot of people who use both tools are simply testing assumptions out and not necessarily expressing their true views, and b) Iām not sure whether recruiting people without a philosophical background would yield high-quality data. These might mean itās not worth the effort, but Iām curious what the teamās thoughts are!
I was imagining you could use the tools to assess peopleās views about cause prioritization! In particular, Iām not sure whether you record usersā responses when they use either tool, but Iād be interested in seeing these data. It may also be valuable to recruit a more representative sample to see how most people react to moral uncertainty or otherwise engage with the tools.
Of course, I think a limitation in both these cases is that most people are pretty unfamiliar with moral uncertainty, and so a) probably a lot of people who use both tools are simply testing assumptions out and not necessarily expressing their true views, and b) Iām not sure whether recruiting people without a philosophical background would yield high-quality data. These might mean itās not worth the effort, but Iām curious what the teamās thoughts are!