Question on this, I think it wasnât very clear what is the actual total budget for Hive for 2025? how much is already covered?
Do you have any outstanding grants on the table?
How do you currently value your cost-effectiveness on how much $ you are adding to the movement vs. spending.
Question on this, I think it wasnât very clear what is the actual total budget for Hive for 2025? how much is already covered? Do you have any outstanding grants on the table?
Happy to clear this up!
So far, we have raised ~$162k for 2025.
The Budget we need to maintain our current capacity is ~$260k. Therefore, technically, we are still fundraising to maintain our capacity as opposed to actually growing Hive.
However, to be transparent about our funding situation, plans and expectations, we are currently being evaluated for a renewal grant with Open Philanthropy. It is quite difficult for us to estimate whether and how much they are going to grant us; but we are moderately confident/âhopeful that we will at least secure a grant of similar size as we did in 2024 ($100k). Considering that there are likely other grant opportunities throughout 2024 that we would apply for as well (although these would be a bit more complicated to lay out and predict), we believe that additional funding raised from our end of year giving campaign would likely (hopefully) marginally contribute beyond this ~$260k and thus (hopefully) contribute to our growth. Securing our basic budget before the end of 2024 would be beneficial for us because this would allow us to hire new team members (currently their contracts run out at the end of 2024 because we havenât raised the money for the salaries yet).
In that scenario, our âTotal Budgetâ in terms of âWhat we hope to raise and believe we can cost-effectively scale up to) is ~$420k for 2025.
How do you currently value your cost-effectiveness on how much $ you are adding to the movement vs. spending.
We currently only use $ added to the movement as internal estimates and decided not to include them in the post, because we are still collecting data, working out uncertainties and refining some key aspects. Iâll gladly outline our current thinking/âplans, but do take them with a grain of salt, as they may change as we mature as an organization:
As quite common with community-building efforts, we find that a large portion of the value we are hoping to bring to the movement is hard to measure objectively. This includes value from keeping advocates up-to-date, providing them with knowledge to help their advocacy or being engaged in the community. Of course, this would also include impact we donât learn about (which we estimate at about 20-30%).
However, we believe that our âHigh Impact Outcomesâ (which include job and volunteer placements, new projects started and instances in which advocates received funding as a result of Hive) might be somewhat reasonably put into monetary value (thus, the special attention to it).
In order to translate these High Impact Outcomes to $ added, we currently use AACâs ICAP measurement as outlined here. This includes various subjective judgment calls on our end, which he hope to get more external views on once we refine some key aspects further, such as:
What is the relative value of non-job High Impact Outcomes to job placements? (e.g., how many volunteer role placements can be equated to job placements?)
How do non-job High Impact Outcomes behave in their counterfactuality compared to job placements?
Our plan is to cover our costs in manually logged High Impact Outcomes alone; such that any additional âdifficult to measureâ form of impact can be considered âfor freeâ. We have thus managed to succeed with this under our best guess estimates for the above judgment calls. We believe this to be a reasonable goal for 2025 as well.
As we are expecting longer timelines for the impact of our work (note that we have only been a registered organization since 2023), we plan to slowly raise our goals in this domain; e.g., covering our costs with our lower-bound estimates â exceeding our costs with lower-bound estimates by 2x, etc.
In the meantime, as we gather more data and a deeper understanding of the various types of impact we may carry, we hope to be able to outline the other areas of impact of our work in terms of $ added, make better estimates of the relative proportion of High Impact Outcomes to the rest of our work, etc. to help concretize the value of community building efforts.
I hope this makes sense! Let us know if you have any questions regarding this!
Question on this, I think it wasnât very clear what is the actual total budget for Hive for 2025? how much is already covered? Do you have any outstanding grants on the table?
How do you currently value your cost-effectiveness on how much $ you are adding to the movement vs. spending.
Hey there! Thank you for your questions!
Question on this, I think it wasnât very clear what is the actual total budget for Hive for 2025? how much is already covered? Do you have any outstanding grants on the table?
Happy to clear this up!
So far, we have raised ~$162k for 2025.
The Budget we need to maintain our current capacity is ~$260k. Therefore, technically, we are still fundraising to maintain our capacity as opposed to actually growing Hive.
However, to be transparent about our funding situation, plans and expectations, we are currently being evaluated for a renewal grant with Open Philanthropy. It is quite difficult for us to estimate whether and how much they are going to grant us; but we are moderately confident/âhopeful that we will at least secure a grant of similar size as we did in 2024 ($100k). Considering that there are likely other grant opportunities throughout 2024 that we would apply for as well (although these would be a bit more complicated to lay out and predict), we believe that additional funding raised from our end of year giving campaign would likely (hopefully) marginally contribute beyond this ~$260k and thus (hopefully) contribute to our growth. Securing our basic budget before the end of 2024 would be beneficial for us because this would allow us to hire new team members (currently their contracts run out at the end of 2024 because we havenât raised the money for the salaries yet).
In that scenario, our âTotal Budgetâ in terms of âWhat we hope to raise and believe we can cost-effectively scale up to) is ~$420k for 2025.
How do you currently value your cost-effectiveness on how much $ you are adding to the movement vs. spending.
We currently only use $ added to the movement as internal estimates and decided not to include them in the post, because we are still collecting data, working out uncertainties and refining some key aspects. Iâll gladly outline our current thinking/âplans, but do take them with a grain of salt, as they may change as we mature as an organization:
As quite common with community-building efforts, we find that a large portion of the value we are hoping to bring to the movement is hard to measure objectively. This includes value from keeping advocates up-to-date, providing them with knowledge to help their advocacy or being engaged in the community. Of course, this would also include impact we donât learn about (which we estimate at about 20-30%).
However, we believe that our âHigh Impact Outcomesâ (which include job and volunteer placements, new projects started and instances in which advocates received funding as a result of Hive) might be somewhat reasonably put into monetary value (thus, the special attention to it).
In order to translate these High Impact Outcomes to $ added, we currently use AACâs ICAP measurement as outlined here. This includes various subjective judgment calls on our end, which he hope to get more external views on once we refine some key aspects further, such as:
How analogous is our work in terms of base placement to ICAP ratio?
What is the relative value of non-job High Impact Outcomes to job placements? (e.g., how many volunteer role placements can be equated to job placements?)
How do non-job High Impact Outcomes behave in their counterfactuality compared to job placements?
Our plan is to cover our costs in manually logged High Impact Outcomes alone; such that any additional âdifficult to measureâ form of impact can be considered âfor freeâ. We have thus managed to succeed with this under our best guess estimates for the above judgment calls. We believe this to be a reasonable goal for 2025 as well.
As we are expecting longer timelines for the impact of our work (note that we have only been a registered organization since 2023), we plan to slowly raise our goals in this domain; e.g., covering our costs with our lower-bound estimates â exceeding our costs with lower-bound estimates by 2x, etc.
In the meantime, as we gather more data and a deeper understanding of the various types of impact we may carry, we hope to be able to outline the other areas of impact of our work in terms of $ added, make better estimates of the relative proportion of High Impact Outcomes to the rest of our work, etc. to help concretize the value of community building efforts.
I hope this makes sense! Let us know if you have any questions regarding this!