Users cast preliminary votes to nominate posts they’ve found valuable for the final voting stage. (December 1 - December 14)
Users review posts — explaining how the posts have been useful (or not), which of their ideas seem best (or worst), and so on. (December 15 - January 11)
Users cast final votes on posts, based on their own experience and others’ reviews. The posts with the most votes are, hopefully, those that have provided the most collective value to the community. (January 12 - January 26) To see what this looks like in practice, check out LessWrong’s 2019 Review and its results.
I hope that in the review phase, we’ll be able to see preliminary votes? For example, if there’s an old moderately popular post that I believe is quite wrong, I would probably want to write a high-effort negative review on it if and only if it was significantly upvoted in the nomination stage. Presumably that’s the point of having the nomination phase before the review phase? I’d appreciate if this was clarified, though.
Edit: just read the complementary post on LessWrong, and it looks like the answer is yes.
Update: it’s the review stage, and I can’t see how much posts were upvoted. (By the way, how are they sorted?) I would like to be able to so that I can better prioritize review-writing.
For example, one post that I strong-downvoted was nominated, and I’d like to review it iff it received more than a couple upvotes (or if it gets positive reviews).
(LW Developer here: there’s a code update ready-to-ship that updates the /reviewVoting page to show the outcome. It’s been a bit delayed in merging roughly because JP and I are in different timezones)
I hope that in the review phase, we’ll be able to see preliminary votes? For example, if there’s an old moderately popular post that I believe is quite wrong, I would probably want to write a high-effort negative review on it if and only if it was significantly upvoted in the nomination stage. Presumably that’s the point of having the nomination phase before the review phase? I’d appreciate if this was clarified, though.
Edit: just read the complementary post on LessWrong, and it looks like the answer is yes.
Update: it’s the review stage, and I can’t see how much posts were upvoted. (By the way, how are they sorted?) I would like to be able to so that I can better prioritize review-writing.
For example, one post that I strong-downvoted was nominated, and I’d like to review it iff it received more than a couple upvotes (or if it gets positive reviews).
(LW Developer here: there’s a code update ready-to-ship that updates the /reviewVoting page to show the outcome. It’s been a bit delayed in merging roughly because JP and I are in different timezones)