I liked this commentary even if I disagreed with a lot of the bottom line conclusions. Since we have an inferential gap that could be quite large, I don’t expect everything you say to make sense to me.
You are probably directionally correct so I have strong upvoted this to encourage you to continue writing.
I don’t have the energy right now to get into the object-level but feel free to share future draft posts as your thoughts develop. If I have a spare moment, I’d be very happy to share any feedback I have on your future thoughts with you.
(all good humor tends to be pointing to some angle of the truth that needs time to become nuanced enough to be more widely legible)
I liked this commentary even if I disagreed with a lot of the bottom line conclusions. Since we have an inferential gap that could be quite large, I don’t expect everything you say to make sense to me.
You are probably directionally correct so I have strong upvoted this to encourage you to continue writing.
I don’t have the energy right now to get into the object-level but feel free to share future draft posts as your thoughts develop. If I have a spare moment, I’d be very happy to share any feedback I have on your future thoughts with you.
(all good humor tends to be pointing to some angle of the truth that needs time to become nuanced enough to be more widely legible)