My assumption was that, if things monotonically improve, then in the long run (perhaps the very, very long run) we will get to net positive. You are proposing that we might instead asymptote at some negative value, even though we are still always improving?
Yeah, it would change the meaning.
My assumption was that, if things monotonically improve, then in the long run (perhaps the very, very long run) we will get to net positive. You are proposing that we might instead asymptote at some negative value, even though we are still always improving?
I wasn’t proposing that (I in fact think the present is already good), but rather was just trying to better understand what you meant.
Your comment clarified my understanding.