I don’t think realism / anti realism has much to do with it, it doesn’t necessarily change the actual content of ethics.
And if anti realism is true, then I’m definitely not going to change my views just because of what philosophers think.
It’s more a question of what meta-ethical view you hold personally, rather than what philosophers think.
If you hold an anti-realist view such that you think the concept of moral obligation is incoherent, you won’t feel morally obligated to do things.
Then you sure aren’t obligated to do accurate marketing, or anything else. That kind of nihilism just blows everything up. It’s a bit like saying “I’m just a Boltzmann brain, therefore drowning kids don’t exist.”
I don’t think realism / anti realism has much to do with it, it doesn’t necessarily change the actual content of ethics.
And if anti realism is true, then I’m definitely not going to change my views just because of what philosophers think.
It’s more a question of what meta-ethical view you hold personally, rather than what philosophers think.
If you hold an anti-realist view such that you think the concept of moral obligation is incoherent, you won’t feel morally obligated to do things.
Then you sure aren’t obligated to do accurate marketing, or anything else. That kind of nihilism just blows everything up. It’s a bit like saying “I’m just a Boltzmann brain, therefore drowning kids don’t exist.”