So basically for an industry like AI, where uncertainty is high, the risks are still not fully understood and governance is still evolving, Congress is struggling to preempt states despite significant executive and industry pressure. But in a mature industry like agriculture, where states have democratically enacted standards, crate-free pathways already exist, suffering is visible and courts have clearly upheld laws, suddenly preemption is on the table and inserted into a must-pass bill. I mean where is the consistency here? It makes one question whether federal preemption is a concern at all for Congress or if it’s applied selectively depending on the industry or interests..
So basically for an industry like AI, where uncertainty is high, the risks are still not fully understood and governance is still evolving, Congress is struggling to preempt states despite significant executive and industry pressure. But in a mature industry like agriculture, where states have democratically enacted standards, crate-free pathways already exist, suffering is visible and courts have clearly upheld laws, suddenly preemption is on the table and inserted into a must-pass bill. I mean where is the consistency here? It makes one question whether federal preemption is a concern at all for Congress or if it’s applied selectively depending on the industry or interests..