I think that the use of an LLM here embodies what they are prioritizing: speed and results-orientation.
The blog post pattern-matches to AI-speak, but clearly communicates what they are looking for. If anything, I would update positively for the prudent use of AI here.
I think it’s possible to gain the efficiency of using LLM assistance without sacrificing style/tone — it just requires taste and more careful prompting/context, which seems worth it for a job ad. Maybe it works for their intended audience, but puts me off.
I think that the use of an LLM here embodies what they are prioritizing: speed and results-orientation.
The blog post pattern-matches to AI-speak, but clearly communicates what they are looking for. If anything, I would update positively for the prudent use of AI here.
I think it’s possible to gain the efficiency of using LLM assistance without sacrificing style/tone — it just requires taste and more careful prompting/context, which seems worth it for a job ad. Maybe it works for their intended audience, but puts me off.
Sure—I am not per se bothered that much by AI speak. It seems like a reasonable trade-off.