I think it’s potentially misleading to have chains of reference like this where from the outside it looks like “EA organizations recommend X” and when you get to the bottom of it there’s just one person giving nothing more than a professional opinion (which could be politically biased, as well).
Agree with this. It should be clear wherever a recommendation is based on the OpenPhil post that the post is the nature of the recommendation. It should also be clear how seriously we ought to take the post.
Agree with this. It should be clear wherever a recommendation is based on the OpenPhil post that the post is the nature of the recommendation. It should also be clear how seriously we ought to take the post.